A list of unpopular opinions I have, ranging from the major to the mundane, followed by a short explanation. And we’ll start with a Cliff:
Neither the Red Sox nor Phillies will make the World Series. The Red Sox lineup is being talked about like the ’27 Yankees, but it’s hardly better than the current Yankees’ lineup. Carl Crawford is the most overrated player in baseball (but Gonzalez will be a beast). Their pitching staff is dreadful outside Buchholz. Cliff Lee is the pitching equivalent of Crawford, and Halladay and Oswalt are entering the downside of their careers. Hamels is wildly inconsistent.
Neither Angelina Jolie nor Scarlett Johannson is particularly attractive. I mean, once or twice, sure, but come on, there’s a reason both have been divorced. Neither is exactly pretty. Jolie looks too much like Joan Rivers and Johannson has a fat face.
The BCS is far superior to any proposed playoff. All the BCS does is provide us with the two most deserving teams playing for the national championship every season. A playoff would devalue the regular season and possibly give us an undeserving champion because of injuries which happened in extra games.
The Man City experience is helping the Premier League. The fear is that the Gay Bar’s reckless spending will buy them trophies, but so far, that is proving far from accurate. It is also forcing the hand of other teams, such as Spurs, who will almost certainly splash out cash on a world-class striker very shortly.
It makes more sense to wash your hands before you urinate than after you urinate. Of course this only applies to those who wash there in the morning and can successfully use the bathroom without pissing on themselves. But you touch hundreds of things during the day that are much dirtier than a body part that has been covered by clothing all day.
Either the Chargers or Colts will win the AFC. The two preseason favorites have been largely forgotten, but are rounding into form. Quarterback play will kill both the Ravens and the Jets (who also have highly overrated defenses) and the Patriots will almost assuredly have to beat San Diego and Indy back to back. I don’t see it.
Facebook will be irrelevant within three years. Too many people, even those who use it frequently, claim to hate it. Too many people talk about deleting their accounts. When something better comes along (and it assuredly will), it will go the way of MySpace.
I do an amazing impression of the man on the right.
There are benefits to writing a blog instead of a syndicated column. One is what you are about to read.
See, I would be eviscerated for this column if it entered the national spotlight. I would be considered a woman-hater. While that may not be far off base, it’s not the case when it comes to athletics. I prefer women’s tennis to the men’s version (and not SOLELY because I enjoy watching the likes of Maria Kirilenko and Ana Ivanovic).
I’ll even watch the occasional women’s college basketball game. I’ve watched parts of two Baylor games this season, against Connecticut and against Tennessee. The latter prompted me to make my favorite joke of the year (Brittany Griner reminds me of a modern-day Wilt Chamberlain … not so much in how she plays, but more because she is a giant who is going to sleep with 20,000 women).
I also watch both college football and high school football. That doesn’t make them the same thing, which is why I find it so outrageous that people are talking about UCONN’s 88-game winning streak in the same breath as the UCLA teams of the early ‘70s that won 88 games in a row.
I mean, if people had spoken of De La Salle High School’s 151-game winning streak as breaking Oklahoma’s record for consecutive wins (47), it would have been laughed off, right? Well, you’d hope, but to me, that would have still made more sense than comparing UCONN’s women to UCLA’s men.
Ignore for a minute that the worst men’s college basketball team would obliterate the UCONN women. That’s not the point. I fully congratulate Geno Auriemma and his players for their accomplishment of beating other women’s teams.
But do you know why Auriemma has never taken a men’s college basketball job? Here’s a hint. It’s not because his current position is more rewarding from either a career standpoint or a financial standpoint.
It’s because the men play a completely different game. Different ball, different rules (You can use the whole shot clock to get the ball across half court. How stupid is that?) and different tactics.
Most damning, there is a completely different talent pool. See, this is something else that will sound chauvinistic, but if you are honest with yourself, you have to admit there are more good male college basketball players than female college basketball players. It’s not Maya Moore’s fault that this is the case, but most girls don’t grow up with a basketball underneath their pillow, to quote Cheech & Chong.
So while we should appreciate what the UCONN women have done, to compare them to the teams led by Sidney Wicks, Henry Bibby, Bill Walton (who I have always loved and will always love – I mean, who else uses a Walton quote for a title of a blog entry?) and Jamaal Wilkes and the competition they played is both blasphemous and ridiculous.
It has been over THIRTY years since a men’s college basketball team went undefeated. UCONN would have to go thirty years without losing to deserve a spot in history next to John Wooden’s great teams of the 1970’s.
Don’t be politically correct, be rational. Even if you’re a woman and that word isn’t a part of your daily vocabulary.
You can't expect to send me a message like, "How do you break down the game? What are your thoughts?" and get less than a 600-word response. That said, an Auburn fan sent me that on Facebook, and this response was about 56 times too long to go on his wall. I typed this up in like 10 minutes, so it's not exactly my finest work of all time. But here goes ...
Both teams have a couple things strongly in their favor. We’ll start with Oregon. Auburn hasn’t played an elite quarterback this season, other than the quarter or so that Mallett played before he got hurt. I don’t think the Tigers will have any answer for Darren Thomas, who is basically a poor man’s Cam Newton (but not that poor, he’s better at running the option and at least as accurate a passer). I think Jeff Maehl (if you haven’t seen Oregon play, think Wes Welker) will have a huge game.
Oregon, on the other hand, plays in a conference stocked with elite QBs, and while Newton is a step above all of them except Luck, I don’t think they’ll be wowed. Another advantage for Oregon is their playmakers on defense. In all championship games, but especially one like this where there don’t figure to be many punts, turnovers are critical. Oregon has more guys who force them than Auburn does.
There’s two other things I’d worry about if I was an Auburn fan. My respect for Gus Malzahn – remember, I’m from Tulsa and my mom graduated from there, so I’ve been following him for a while – may have me overrating his value, but his head needs to be fully on Oregon. Despite the recent raise/extension, the rumors were out there and he SHOULD be getting a marquee coaching job, and I wonder if he is totally invested in this game. You would hope so, but it’s a concern, especially since the Oregon staff is, for my money, much better than the rest of the Auburn staff. Also, Auburn has had a problem falling behind early in games. If Oregon jumps out early, they’ll be almost impossible to come back on.
Auburn’s advantages kind of start there. They have played close games. Most people expect this to be close, and Oregon doesn’t have much experience in those situations (the bizarre game against Cal excluded). Of course, you can argue that Oregon would have never struggled with the likes of Clemson and Kentucky, but still, if the game is within a score in the fourth quarter, I think Auburn will have a tremendous advantage.
And I also think there is a good chance that Auburn can keep James and Barner in check. Obviously those guys are amazing athletes and will put up numbers, but they are speed backs, and the one good thing (other than Fairley) that you can say about Auburn’s defense is that they have plenty of speed.
Also, there is the possibility that Newton is a transcendent player. He’s obviously an exceptional player, but very, very seldom do we see a truly transcendent athlete. He could be that rare guy, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he follows the footsteps of Vince Young (God, it hurts me to say that) and wins the game almost single-handedly against a superior team.
But I keep coming back to the fact that Oregon just destroyed a difficult schedule (All they do is WIN!). I think Stanford and Oregon are the two best teams in the nation and I rank Oregon turning a 21-3 deficit into a 52-31 win over the Cardinal as the most impressive performance since USC fell a touchdown behind Oklahoma and then overwhelmed them to the tune of 55-19 (FML). I just think Oregon has the better offense, better defense, better special teams, better coach, and they’ve played better teams. Everything about this game tells me Oregon will win a high-scoring game. Something like 56-45. But I’ve been wrong before.
The NHL used to be my favorite American sport. Then, in 2004-05, there was a lockout, and in an effort to regain fans, Gary Bettman – a man who can best be described as having the worst qualities of the commissioners of the three other major sports – and his cronies decided to make rule changes that led to dramatically increased scoring.
Don’t worry, this isn’t an NHL blog, you can keep reading. That is simply a historical lesson of the dangers of changing rules in a way which can alienate long-time fans.
Here’s the thing. College football is facing a crossroads. Because of the increasingly more complex spread offenses that are sweeping the nation, defenses can’t keep up. And that’s the understatement of the month.
I don’t want to sound like one of these old men who insists everything was better in his day. Hell, I still consider this “my day.” But Lou Holtz would be rolling over in his grave if he saw a national championship game with an over/under of 74.
I think we should look to Canada for the answer (There’s a sentence you’ve never read before and likely will never read again).
See, in the Canadian Football League, they get three downs. As in, a third-and-three is often a punting situation. Well, I recommend the NCAA institute the same rule.
On the surface, I can see how this sounds blasphemous. And one of the things I find most ridiculous in sports is a different set of rules in the college and professional versions of a sport.
However, in recent years, there is less and less similarity in the college and professional games anyway. The main difference is that NFL defenses are still on par with NFL offenses, while every time a college defense forces a punt, the players react as if they have just collectively lost their virginity.
Never mind what Auburn and Oregon did offensively this season on their way to Glendale. The 103rd ranked scoring offense scored 21 points per game. Duke scored over 25 ppg. Duke!
You’ve never heard of most of these guys unless you are a hardcore college football fan: Mikel Leshoure, Bilal Powell, Edwin Baker, Knile Davis, Jay Finley, James White, Isaiah Pead, Montee Ball, Ray Graham, Lamar Miller. What do they have in common? They all played in major conferences, averaged over 10 carries per game and over six yards per rush attempt. I mean, these aren’t even elite guys. Then there’s Alex Green, who is averaging 8.78 yards per carry.
Of the top 10 teams, the worst yards per pass attempt was by Oregon’s Darren Thomas, at 7.84. All he did this year was lead an offense that scored over 40 points ten times, over 50 points six times, over 60 points three times and over 70 points once.
That’s not how the game is meant to be played. It used to be that these numbers were reserved for video games. In this rare case, the rules must be changed to make the game more like professional football.
Four downs is too much. Even at three, scoring will be high. Games won’t be any less exciting. Just look to hockey, where the game has become so open it’s not worth watching.
NOTE: This column started as a gimmick, a pun on the title, but developed into a format of writing I really enjoyed. I shouldn’t be surprised. I’ve only read a few things written with footnotes[1], and I’ve always found them entertaining.
There are nine bowl games I care to watch – and that is stretching it in some cases – and sixteen bowl games in which I’ve never heard of the sponsor referenced outside of the bowl game.[2] Viva NCAA!
Anyway, here’s a quickie preview of each.
Insight Bowl: #12 Missouri (-1) vs. Iowa
Why do I like this seemingly meaningless game? It’s the first chance for me to see if I’m right about the Big 10. While I think the Pac-10 narrowly edges it as the best conference in America, the Big 10 is as good as it’s been since Ki-Jana Carter played there. Iowa is, despite its record, one of the best 15 teams in the nation (I would actually have them in the top 10). After the team realized the Big 10 title was out of reach, the Hawkeyes ended the year with three straight losses. I expect Kirk Ferentz[3] to rally his team and lead them to a comfortable victory over a vastly overrated Missouri team. Or maybe I’m just hoping for another amazing post-game interview from Iowa QB Ricki Stanzi (Video below. Trust me, it’s worth 40 seconds of your life.)
Iowa 27, Missouri 17
Capital One Bowl: #9 Michigan State (+10) vs. #16 Alabama
Pay more attention to the point spread than the teams’ rankings. Alabama is a top-five team on paper, while Michigan State has been overachievers. There are also, bizarrely, many ties between the two schools[4], despite their location and non-history of playing each other.
Will Alabama care about winning this game? Or will it be another case of, “Eff it, the season is a lost cause,” like when Utah embarrassed the Crimson Tide two years ago? If Alabama does show up, it could get ugly fast for the Spartans. But Mark Dantonio[5] will have his team ready and I would expect a fair amount of trickery in the biggest game in Michigan State history[6]. Plus, physical teams give Alabama problems, at least according to the most rational Alabama fan I know, Jordan Vickers[7].
Alabama 28, Michigan State 24
Gator Bowl: #21 Mississippi State (-5) vs. Michigan
This is the worst possible matchup for embattled Michigan coach Rich Rodriguez. He’s playing a team that is probably going to beat his Wolverines convincingly, but because of name recognition, the score will look embarrassing. I love watching Denard Robinson play, but Mississippi State already neutralized his doppelganger, Cam Newton. Mississippi State will run the ball at will.[8]
Mississippi State 38, Michigan 21
Rose Bowl Game: #3 TCU (-2.5) vs. #5 Wisconsin
I think this TCU team would have had the best chance ever of a non-BCS school winning a national championship game[9]. That doesn’t mean the Horned Frogs deserve to play for it, as I think Wisconsin will prove. But I can see myself taking a nap during this game. This game almost didn’t make the list of games I care about. Considering it’s two top-five teams, I think it’s fair to say this year was more diluted than the free drinks you get at the poker table.
Tostitos Fiesta Bowl: #7 Oklahoma (-17) vs. Connecticut
If you had told me before the year that Oklahoma would be playing Connecticut in a bowl game, I would have bought the rights to www.firebobstoops.com. But Oklahoma is as good as anybody in the country when Landry Jones doesn’t turn into Jake Delhomme. It won’t matter if he turns into Jake Gyllenhaal[11] against the worst team to ever play in a BCS game.
Oklahoma 56, Connecticut 10
Discover Orange Bowl: #4 Stanford (-3.5) vs. #13 Virginia Tech
If the Big 10 had a conference championship game, Virginia Tech hadn’t blown the Boise game[12], and Auburn had failed to pull one of its miracles, this could be the national title game. Alas, it’s still worth watching, if only for the two quarterbacks. Andrew Luck is a future NFL superstar[13], but Tyrod Taylor is quite the college quarterback as well. He’ll keep them in this, but Stanford’s superior coaching[14] and intelligence will prove to be the difference.
Stanford 38, Virginia Tech 31
Allstate Sugar Bowl: #6 Ohio State (-3.5) vs. #8 Arkansas
Interesting for two reasons. Ohio State has played SEC teams in bowl games nine times and has lost nine times. This Ohio State team isn’t any better than most of those other nine teams.
I still think the Buckeyes will win, and that brings me to interesting reason number two. Ryan Mallett is a choke artist in big games against competent defenses[15]. I think he’ll challenge Mr. Leaf for the “Biggest QB bust named Ryan” award[16].
Ohio State 31, Arkansas 17
Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl: #15 Nevada (-9.5) vs. Boston College
Fun fact: This game will be played eight days after the first BCS bowls, and the day before the national championship game.
A lot of people will be rooting for Boston College in this game because of Mark Herzlich[17]. I can’t blame them because his story is the true essence of what makes college sports great. But I’ll be watching this game because it’s the last time I’ll ever get to watch Colin Kaepernick play quarterback, which has been one of the highlights of my life as a sports fan the past four years. It’s one of the benefits of knowing someone who lives in Reno[18], along with things like, “Hey I want to get a bet on the Packers to win the NFC but the best price I can find is 5-1,” and Bret then telling me he found them at 9-1. Go Pack. And Go Wolfpack.
Anyway, Boston College found some success in the ACC, but hasn’t seen anything similar to Kaepernick, Vai Taua and Chris Ault’s Pistol.
Nevada 45, Boston College 21
Tostito’s BCS National Championship Game: #1 Auburn (-3) vs. #2 Oregon
“We try to equalize before the other team have scored.” – Danny Branchflower.
That quote came from the man who captained Tottenham’s famous double-winning season of 1961, but it may as well have come from one of the head coaches involved in this game. A lot of people have said these teams are mirror-images of one another because, well, it’s true. There’s a reason this total is 74[19].
It’s not so much that these teams don’t care about defense, but, as a close friend and Auburn fanatic told me, “We don’t worry about stopping the other team. If they score, they score, but we get the ball. We just would rather they score fast.”
Well, don’t worry, they will. And you will. And they will. And you will.
I think the difference is that Oregon’s defense has the type of playmakers who can force turnovers from an often inaccurate Cam Newton[20]. And if Auburn continues its first half struggles, Oregon could be out of sight before the Tigers recover.
One thing is for certain. This year’s national champion will be the least deserving of that trophy since 2004, when LSU stole the national title from a far superior Oklahoma team[21]. However, these teams are more than capable of providing a highly entertaining game, even if it leaves a lot to be desired from a purist’s standpoint.[22]
Oregon 56, Auburn 45
[1] Most recently was Bill Simmons’ The Book of Basketball, which I highly recommend. I’d feel worse about hijacking his format if he hadn’t jumped on the Tottenham Hotspur bandwagon five years after me.
[2] My personal favorite is the Beef ‘O’ Brady’s St. Petersburg Bowl. Let’s just say if you’re watching this game on December 21, you have a gambling problem.
[3] Ferentz and Herb Sendek are the two most underrated coaches in any sport.
[4] Alabama coach Nick Saban used to coach Michigan State. Current MSU coach Mark Dantonio is a former Saban assistant. Alabama’s star running back Mark Ingram is from Flint, Michigan.
[5] How weird is it that there is a prominent coach named Mark Dantonio and a prominent coach named Mike D’Antoni?
[6] Not saying much. This is a school that has “Former MSU quarterback Jeff Smoker now plays in the Arena Football League” in the fifth paragraph of its Wikipedia entry for football.
[7] That’s about like saying, the hottest woman in West Virginia – which is appropriate since Jordan Vickers sounds like the name of a hot chick. By the way, almost every single woman in West Virginia is about 10 pounds too heavy, has something slightly off with her face and smells like a cigarette.
[8] ESPN’s take on its preview of the game? “(Mississippi State) boasts a better defense than Michigan.” Um, yeah. Alabama also boasts hotter women than West Virginia. Can you tell I’m somewhat bitter about this fact?
[9] That statement is more of an indictment against the “elite” teams this year than praise for TCU.
[10] Bet under 57 in this game. Unless, of course, you don’t like money.
[11] With his mustache and drawl, Landry Jones could absolutely play a homosexual cowboy in a movie.
[12] They would have never lost the following game. The Hokies could have played Power Hour three times the night before the James Madison game and been less hungover.
[13] A more athletic Sam Bradford. If the Panthers start winning and blow the #1 draft pick, they will regret it for the next 15 years.
[14] Assuming Michigan, Florida or some NFL team don’t do the smart thing and hand Jim Harbaugh a blank check.
[15] His performance in the fourth quarter against Texas A&M ranks right up there with the worst quarters I’ve ever seen by a supposedly good player. He had three interceptions dropped, an interception bizarrely ruled a completion, and he committed a personal foul penalty with under four minutes left that led to A&M getting the ball near midfield trailing by a touchdown.
[16] Coming in last? Ryan Fitzpatrick. I went to a Bills game last year and was blown away by how passionate and pessimistic their fans are. I’m glad they finally have someone worth watching. Yes, I know they’re 2-10.
[17] Another fun fact: I actually know a girl who turned down Mark Herzlich for a date.
[18] Another is knowing who Bryce Harper is years before the rest of the world. My friend actually coached against him and spoke about him like foot-long subs speak about Jared. He just DECIMATED them. P.S. - Harper is starting the season at Hagerstown, 15 minutes from where I currently live. Mmmm.
[19] And the game is going over that total before the fourth quarter starts.
[20] Don’t fool yourself. Passing efficiency numbers are meaningless. The play in the Alabama game where Newton threw the ball straight to Mark Barron and Terrell Zachary stole the ball for a 70-yard touchdown was a microcosm of Newton’s season.
[21] I’m biased, but watch the replay. Jason White was less mobile than Betty White. How he even played boggles my mind. It’s the one reason I smile but don’t join in on the jokes about him working at Wal-Mart, etc., etc.
[22] That wasn’t intended to have a double meaning, but I’m sure Mike Bianchi would take it that way.
He didn’t like it because it was lazy (it was), but my bigger issue was with the overwhelming sense of self-righteousness.
Well, I think you’ll find that’s not much of an issue in my writings.
I turned 25 in May. Since then I have:
·Smoked pot over 100 times
·Had sex with a truly reprehensible person
·Fallen for an 18-year old
·Committed third-degree theft on multiple occasions (don’t ask)
·Driven drunk about a dozen times
Sadly – though I am, to quote Earl Hickey, “trying to be a better person,” – there are quite a few other things that could have made this list.
By the way, I’m four years older than Cam Newton and five years older than LaMichael James. Oh, and my life is more of the rule than the exception. People whose names start with “twenty” don’t make good decisions. Like, ever.
Is it fair for me to begrudge Newton and James for their transgressions? For that matter, is it fair to begrudge Lebron James for his behavior in the past six months? No and no.
See, it seems Lebron has been around forever. But he is … wait for it … 25. Twenty-five. What 25-year old wouldn’t go play with his close friends in Miami? What 25-year old would turn down almost constant guilt-free sex with the hottest women on South Beach?
For that matter, would Mike Bianchi? I mean, if he didn’t look like this. (I love the title of this article. And yes, the comment by "Razz" was mine.)
There is such expectancy in this current sports world where a 17-year old can be the first pick in the MLB draft. Today, the announcer of Spurs’ final Champions League group game (Group winners! Glory, Glory Tottenham Hotspur!) casually mentioned that today was Gareth Bale’s 100th appearance for Tottenham.
Gareth is 21 years old. He has indisputably been one of the best handful of players in the world this year, but his humbleness and loyalty is quite refreshing and rare.
Not just in the sports world, but in the world of all the young dudes.
The athletes who don’t live up to the old guard’s ridiculous expectations should still be cherished by those of us who realize that everyone makes mistakes.
I’m not generally one for such grandiose, incinerating comments. OK, I am. But I don’t make this type of statement without a litany of background knowledge and at least some research.
Consider these three quarterbacks:
#1 – 193.0 passing yards per game, 136.92 rushing yards per game, 329.92 total yards per game
#2 – 235.83 passing yards per game, 98.67 rushing yards per game, 334.5 total yards per game
#3 – 199.15 passing yards per game, 108.38 rushing yards per game, 307.53 total yards per game
Only one of these quarterbacks is even going to New York for the Heisman presentation. It has to be #1 or #2, right? No, it’s #3. Not only that, #3, Auburn’s Cam Newton is considered the overwhelming favorite.
The case against #2, Nevada’s Colin Kaepernick, is that he played against weak competition. No argument here. But then why is Boise State's Kellen Moore – who played basically the same schedule, averaged 44.1 yards per game LESS than Kaepernick, finished with the same record and lost to Kaepernick head to head – invited?
The argument against #1, Michigan’s Denard Robinson, is that his team’s record wasn’t that good. Like it’s somehow his fault that his team didn’t worry about trivial things like holding opponents under 40 points per game.
But – and realize that the (well-earned in previous years) stereotype that SEC defenses are the nation’s best is wildly inaccurate this season – Robinson faced much more difficult defenses on a week in, week out basis. Newton faced only two elite defenses all year, Mississippi State and LSU. He did next to nothing against the Bulldogs and had a great rushing but poor passing game against LSU.
The Heisman is supposed to go to the most outstanding player in college football, and there’s really no rational way to argue that Newton was more outstanding than Robinson (The fact that the media, namely Herbstreit, gushes over him more is not a rational argument).
Look, Newton’s a winner. I don’t begrudge him his success. But if you switch him and Robinson, their teams’ records are probably the same. Throw in that Newton plays for the premier offensive coordinator in the country, and I find it shameful that Robinson will be watching Newton accept the Heisman on television.
This brings me back to the original point. The Heisman Trophy needs to be abolished. It was not awarded accurately last year, when Mark Ingram won the award despite not even being the most outstanding player on his own team (that would be Rolando McClain, who nearly killed Darren Sproles Sunday).
I would like to see the NCAA create the same award handed out in virtually every other sport, a Most Valuable Player Trophy. If we’re going to preclude players from teams with mediocre records and players who don’t play in major conferences, this award would at least make sense. Semantically, if not romantically.
I’d still vote for Stanford’s Andrew Luck, who is both the most outstanding and most valuable player in the nation. But at least Newton winning wouldn’t be a sham if the award were for the MVP (You know, until you consider that the history books will ultimately show this year’s Auburn team going 0-12).
The Heisman Trophy, as it is currently constructed, lends itself to being a popularity contest. Would changing it to an MVP award change that? I don't know. But at least there would be ways to justify abject travesties like Denard Robinson and Colin Kaepernick finishing below the likes of Kellen Moore.
One of my former neighbors was convinced I was fooling around with his girlfriend because we spent a lot of time together when he was gone and because we were close friends.
But really, that’s what it was.
I don’t think the same holds true for the world of sports. Quick checklist: Rose? Check. McGwire? Check. A-Rod? Check. Armstrong? Check.
In fact, when I think of every time I’ve ever had reason to think an athlete, coach or organization was doing something illicit, I’ve been proven right. The only possible exception would be the Duke lacrosse scandal, but I don’t think that proves anything other than that bitches will do anything for money and/or attention.
This brings me to Cam Newton. While I don’t care about Auburn too much – I don’t care if they win the national title or lose out, frankly – it’s a subject worth addressing.
Here’s what gets me. There are actually Auburn fans who don’t think Cam (or, more likely, Cecil) Newton took money from Auburn! Their reason for being indignant is usually something along the lines of, “Why is it just coming out now?”
Well, because investigative journalism isn’t an overnight process and that is usually what is required for the NCAA to open an investigation of their own. Southern California was put on probation THIS YEAR for a similar situation that happened involving Reggie Bush in 2005.
The other excuse from the outraged Auburn fans is that Mississippi State is jealous and hates Auburn.
Here’s the problem with that. Phil Fullmer hated Alabama and Bama fans said the same thing about him when Fullmer helped the NCAA expose Alabama for paying players. But, oh yeah, he was right. Do you know why he was right?
Because you don’t make up allegations to the NCAA. It’s career suicide and makes no sense for a program on the rise.
Remember, it was last year that Dez Bryant was suspended for a year for lying about having dinner with Deion Sanders. Bryant was able to recover to the tune of winning the ROYFPNNSB (Rookie of the Year for People Not Named Sam Bradford). A program, hell, an individual coach, would receive a much harsher penalty and could not recover for years.
All I ask is this, Auburn fans. Don’t be irrational. You (correctly, in most cases) think Alabama fans are irrational for their exaggerated claims of national titles and Bear Bryant’s coaching ability.
I’ve been told by someone with connections to Alabama that Julio Jones is “100 percent being paid to play for Alabama.” You know my reaction? I didn’t bat an eye. If I’m being honest, I’m quite certain that Oklahoma is paying several players. Even the most optimistic Auburn fan can’t be so holier-than-thou as to think the Tigers would not do the same to join those teams in the nation's elite.
Oh, and while I’m being honest, I did fool around with that girl a little. So yeah, where there’s smoke, there is fire.
1. The best NFL team won the Super Bowl last year.
2. The best college basketball team won the national championship last year.
3. The best college football team won the national championship last year.
Answers: 1. False 2. False 3. True
Why do we want a playoff again? Oh yeah, because it's the only fair way to determine a champion. Except that, you know, playoffs don't do that at all.
Have you watched March Madness? Like, ever? The minor conference teams are interesting for a weekend, but they don't win it. Butler was a rare exception to even make the final because of a weak field last season (hell, they trailed at halftime to UTEP in their first-round game), but even they didn't win it.
The last champion from a non-major conference was in 1966. It was, coincidentally, the precursor to UTEP, Texas Western. Texas Western won because they played black players in an era when the big schools were afraid to do so (There's actually a pretty good movie about this).
Furthermore, since 1990, no fewer than SIXTEEN champions have been #1 seeds. Two #2 seeds and #3 seeds won the title, while Lute Olson's 1997 Arizona team won the title as (GASP!) a #4 seed.
As you may have guessed, I'm something of a college basketball fanatic. It has historically been my most profitable sport from a gambling perspective, but it is also the only sport I can enjoy watching without having a wager or rooting interest. But unless you are a die-hard like me, you don't know that the season starts in three days. You don't know that #5 Ohio State and #11 Florida play in under two weeks' time.
Hell, why would you? It's not like the game matters.
Do you know why I love college football? It's because after Oklahoma stumbled and bumbled its way to a loss against Missouri, I was truly heartbroken. I was completely inconsolable for quite a while. It meant so much to Oklahoma, and vicariously, to me, that it left me with the kind of feeling usually reserved for devious women.
I feel like Walter Sobchak. "Has the whole world gone crazy?" EVERYONE wants a playoff. But you don't know what you're asking for. It will ruin the game we know and love and make it like college basketball.
Back to the Ohio State/Florida game that at least 26 other people in America are anticipating: Yesterday, I saw an advertisement for college basketball. Was it for this game, or some other huge upcoming game? No. It was for March Madness. Which, as the more intelligent among you may know, is in March.
Can you imagine a world where Alabama loses to South Carolina and the fans have an "Oh well, we'll get them next time" attitude?
Well, you should be able to imagine it. Kentucky basketball fans are pretty similar to Alabama football fans, and that was about their reaction when the Gamecocks handed the Wildcats their first loss last season. Why? Because Kentucky still made the playoff.
But neither they nor Kansas (the best team) won, or even played for, the title because of bad matchups and bad days. We want to decide college football's national champion this way? Come on man.
I don't buy the excuses the NCAA gives for keeping the BCS. More games, less studying, blah, blah, blah. I'll let a better writer than myself refute those. While I despise the NCAA to the core because of their ridiculous rulings on things such as the Dez Bryant case last year, it is so obvious they have this correct.
They came up with the most fair system for determining the two best teams to play for the title. Is it perfect? Of course not. But is it better than the old way, which saw #1 and #2 rarely playing each other and would send Boise to the Humanitarian Bowl every year? By a landslide. And is better than throwing drastically inferior teams into some wacky playoff to satisfy people's delusions? By another landslide.
Here's a thought, Boise. Join a major conference like Utah did. If you envision yourself as a football school, there is no reason for you not to be in the Pac-10, Pac-12 or whatever the hell they are going to call it. Do you think you couldn't have joined over Colo-fucking-rado?
But no.
Just like it was better for Auburn to have been left out of the 2004 BCS title game than to have been ripped apart by the best college football team of the past 15 years, it's better for these small teams not to know.
It is better for Boise and TCU to play 9 or 10 cupcakes every year and then bitch and moan when a one-loss Alabama, Oklahoma or Nebraska is chosen over them. Deep down they know that they only have a couple players who could even make the two-deep for those teams. They know that if they played a motivated 12-1 team from the SEC or Big XII, they would get blown off the field.
Utah has it right. They understand the system and are doing something about it. Will they ever win the national title? Maybe, maybe not. But they are giving themselves a chance.
The American way isn't to give everyone a chance. It's to give everyone a chance who works to deserve a chance. The Boise State's of the world just don't.
EDITOR'S NOTE: For those who would argue #3 was false, that Texas was the best college football team last year ... well, I agree that had McCoy played four quarters, the Longhorns were the favorite to win. But here's the kicker. The BCS gave Texas its deserved chance for the title. A playoff would only increase these kind of injuries that do exactly what the Utopian playoff is supposed to prevent - the best teams having a chance to be champions.
Posts
